Skip to main content

Digital Root or Digital Sum of a Number and its significance

The word Digit means the single figure number; the numbers from 1 to 9 and zero.In mathematics, the digit sum of a given integer is the sum of all its digits, (e.g.: the digit sum of 84001 is calculated as 8+4+0+0+1 = 13).

The digital root (also repeated digital sum) of a number is the (single digit) value obtained by an iterative process of summing digits, on each iteration using the result from the previous iteration to compute a digit sum. The process continues until a single-digit number is reached.

To find digital root of a number, add all its digits. If this sum is more than 9, add the digits of this sum. The single digit obtained at the end is the digital root of the number.
For example, Digital Sum of 24566 is 2+4+5+6+6 = 23 = 2+3 = 5.

Notice that even though sum of the digit of 24566 is 23, 23 is not the digital sum. The sum is again added until we are left with a single digit.

Similarly, the digital root of 65536 is 7, because 6 + 5 + 5 + 3 + 6 = 25 and 2 + 5 = 7.

In other words, it is the remainder when the number is divided by 9. So for 625, the remainder is 4 because 625 ÷ 9 = 69 with a remainder of 4. The digital root is also 4 (6+2+5=13=1+3=4).

A shortcut to find digital rootCasting Out 9’s

Consider the number 19. The digital sum of 19 is 1+9 = 10 = 1. Take the number 129. The digital sum of 129 is 1+2+9 = 12 = 3. And, the digital sum of 1239 is 1+2+3+9 = 15 = 6

So, if a number has 9, this will not have any impact on the digital sum. So, we can safely ignore the digit 9 in the number.

So, can you guess the digital sum of 599992? Ignoring all the 9’s, we are left with 5 and 2. So the digital sum is 5+2=7.

Consider another example 7486352. Here, we do not have any 9’s in the number. So, in order to obtain the digital sum, we will just add all the digits.

Digital Sum of 7486352 is 7+4+8+6+3+5+2 = 35 = 3+5 = 8.

However, there is a shortcut to this procedure. Instead of adding all the digits, if we find a 9 anywhere in the calculation, we cross it out. This is called casting out nines. You can see with this example how this removes a step from our calculations without affecting the result. With the last answer, 7486352, instead of adding7+4+8+6+3+5+2, which equals 35, and then adding 3 + 5, which equals 8, we could cross out group of digits (two or more) that add up to 9. This makes no difference to the answer, but it saves some time and effort. So, 6 & 3 add up to 9, so we can cancel that. Similarly 5 & 4 add up to 9 and 7 & 2 add up to 9.

7 4 8 6 3 5 2

We can cancel all the digits, we are left with the digit 8. So, the digital sum is 8.

The Digit Sum of 549673 is 7“Cast out” the 5+49 and 6+3, leaving just 7.

By Casting Out 9’s, finding a Digit Sum can be done more quickly and mentally!

So, the question arises, why do we need to know Digital Sum of the number?

It turns out, when the numbers are added, subtracted, multiplied or divided; their digital sums will also be respectively added, subtracted, multiplied or divided. So, we can use their digital sums to check the accuracy of the answer.

Check any size number
What makes this method so easy to use is that it changes any size number into a single-digit number. You can check calculations that are too big to go into your calculator by casting out nines.

For instance, if we wanted to check 12,345,678 × 89,045 = 1,099,320,897,510, we would have a problem because most Checking Your Answers 39 calculators can’t handle the number of digits in the answer, so most would show the first digits of the answer with an error sign.

The easy way to check the answer is to cast out the nines. Let’s try it.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 = 0

9 0 4 5 = 8

1 0 9 9 3 2 0 8 9 7 5 1 0 = 0

All of the digits in the answer cancel. The nines automatically cancel, then we have 1 + 8, 2 + 7, then 3 + 5 + 1 = 9, which cancels again. And 0 × 8 = 0, so our answer seems to be correct.
Let’s try another one.

137 × 456 = 62,472

To find our substitute for 137:
1 + 3 + 7 = 11
1 + 1 = 2

There were no shortcuts with the first number. 2 is our substitute for 137.
To find our substitute for 456:
4 + 5 + 6 =
We immediately see that 4 + 5 = 9, so we cross out the 4 and the 5.
That just leaves us with 6, our substitute for 456.
Can we find any nines, or digits adding up to 9, in the answer?
Yes, 7 + 2 = 9, so we cross out the 7 and the 2. We add the other digits:
6 + 2 + 4 = 12
1 + 2 = 3
3 is our substitute answer.

Writing the substitute numbers below the actual numbers might look like this:

137 × 456 = 62,472
  2        6           3

Is 62,472 the right answer?

We multiply the substitute numbers: 2 times 6 equals 12. The digits in 12 add up to 3 (1 + 2 = 3). This is the same as our substitute answer, so we were right again.

Let’s try one more example. Let’s check if this answer is correct:

456 × 831 = 368,936

We write in our substitute numbers:

456 × 831 = 368,936
  6         3            8

That was easy because we cast out (or crossed out) 4 and 5 from the first number, leaving 6. We cast out 8 and 1 from the second number, leaving 3. And almost every digit was cast out of the answer, 3 plus 6 twice, and a 9, leaving a substitute answer of 8.

We now see if the substitutes work out correctly: 6 times 3 is 18, which adds up to 9, which also gets cast out, leaving 0. But our substitute answer is 8, so we have made a mistake somewhere.

When we calculate it again, we get 378,936.

Did we get it right this time? The 936 cancels out, so we add 3 + 7 + 8, which equals 18, and 1 + 8 adds up to 9, which cancels, leaving 0. This is the same as our check answer, so this time we have it right.

Does this method prove we have the right answer? No, but we can be almost certain.

This method won’t find all mistakes. For instance, say we had 3,789,360 for our last answer; by mistake we put a 0 on the end.

The final 0 wouldn’t affect our check by casting out nines and we wouldn’t know we had made a mistake. When it showed we had made a mistake, though, the check definitely proved we had the wrong answer.

Again, we know from the last example, the Digital sum of 378,936 is 0 and the digital sum of 387,936 (which we might have put mistakenly) is also 0. In this case, even though the numbers are different, the Digital sum remains the same as the numbers have changed their places.

So, even digital root technique helps us in eliminating few options (if any, as in case of MCQ) from the question, it cannot conclusively point out the right answer. It is a simple, fast check that will find most mistakes, and should get you 100% scores on most of your math tests.


  1. Digital root can be find by divide the the number by 9.if remainder occur 0 it means digital root is 9 except the remainder is the digital root.. ex.
    which is 6
    if num=81
    then num%9=0
    so digital root is 9


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ORACLE 9i practice solutions

Created by BCL easyConverter SDK 3 (HTML Version)

Hackerrank > SQL > Basic Select

01-Select All
Given a City table, whose fields are described as +-------------+----------+ | Field       | Type     | +-------------+----------+ | ID          | int(11)  | | Name        | char(35) | | CountryCode | char(3)  | | District    | char(20) | | Population  | int(11)  | +-------------+----------+
write a query that will fetch all columns for every row in the table.

My Solution
02-Select by ID
Given a City table, whose fields are described as

Zoho Puzzle Questions With Answers

Measuring Time Logic Puzzle You are given with two ropes with variable width. However if we start burning both the ropes, they will burn at exactly same time i.e. an hour. The ropes are non-homogeneous in nature. You are asked to measure 45 minutes by using these two ropes.

How can you do it?

Please note that you can’t break the rope in half as it is being clearly stated that the ropes are non-homogeneous in nature.
Answer & Explanation Solution: 45 minutes

Explanation :
All you have to do is burn the first rope from both the ends and the second rope from one end only simultaneously. The first rope will burn in 30 minutes (half of an hour since we burned from both sides) while the other rope would have burnt half. At this moment, light the second rope from the other end as well. Where, the second rope would have taken half an hour more to burn completely, it will take just 15 minutes as we have lit it from the other end too.

Thus you have successfully calculated 30+15 = 45 minutes …